Skip to content
Cleaning & LaundryCleaning Tools

BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 vs Shark CH901 in Canada: Which Handheld Vacuum Fits Quick Cleanups?

BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 vs Shark CH901 in Canada compared by dust cup size, weight, tools, power details, charging, filter care and quick-cleanup fit.

9 min read

Estimated reading time: 8 minutes

BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 vs Shark CH901 in Canada is a practical handheld-vacuum comparison for crumbs, stairs, entryways, car seats, couch gaps, pantry spills, and fast dry pickups. BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 is the better fit if you want the larger listed dust bin, 12 V battery platform, extra-long built-in crevice reach, two speeds with Power Boost, and 5-hour charging detail from the Amazon.ca listing. Shark CH901 is the better fit if you want a lighter handheld vacuum with two cyclonic air streams, washable filter, CleanTouch dirt ejector, crevice tool, scrubbing brush, and a compact 2.2 lb listed weight.

The choice is not just brand preference. It comes down to dust-bin size, tool style, carry weight, charging routine, and whether you value reach or a lighter body for quick household cleanups.

BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 vs Shark CH901 in Canada: quick answer

Choose BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 if you want a larger listed 750 mL dust bin, a 12 V battery-powered handheld vacuum, 120 W listing detail, two speeds with Power Boost, an extra-long crevice tool, and a model that makes sense for pantry spills, car seats, stairs, baseboards, and deeper gaps.

Choose Shark CH901 if you want a lighter listed handheld vacuum with dual cyclonic air streams, an XL dust cup in Shark’s product wording, a washable filter, CleanTouch dirt ejector, crevice tool, scrubbing brush, and a compact body for fast grab-and-go cleaning.

Best reach-and-bin pick

BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10

Best if you want the larger listed capacity and extra-long crevice reach for tight spaces, car interiors, stairs and dry household debris.

Check Current Price on Amazon.ca
Best light grab-and-go pick

Shark CH901 UltraCyclone Pro

Best if you want the lighter listed unit, washable filter, CleanTouch emptying, crevice tool, scrubbing brush and compact storage feel.

View Product Details on Amazon.ca
Two generic handheld vacuums on an entryway floor near crumbs and pet hair with a bench and rug in the background
Handheld vacuums are easier to compare by nozzle shape, dust-bin access, grip comfort, charging routine, and how quickly they handle small messes.

Products compared

These two handheld vacuums are comparable because both are cordless, battery-powered, bagless hand vacuums for quick dry pickups around the home and vehicle. They are not replacements for full-size vacuums or wet-dry shop vacs. Their real value is in fast access and small-mess convenience.

BLACK+DECKER dustbuster AdvancedClean+ HHVK320J10

ASIN: B07R9GP85M
Model: HHVK320J10
Core angle: 12 V handheld vacuum with 750 mL listed capacity, two speeds, Power Boost and extra-long crevice reach.

Compare Current Details on Amazon.ca

Shark CH901 UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld Vacuum

ASIN: B08559K2DL
Model: CH901
Core angle: lightweight handheld vacuum with two cyclonic air streams, washable filter, CleanTouch dirt ejector and included detail tools.

See Sizes and Specs on Amazon.ca

Compact comparison table

Listed details from Amazon.ca product identity pages, Shark support pages, and retailer specification pages. Prices, ratings, review counts, and availability are intentionally not shown.
Feature BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 Shark CH901
Best fit Deeper crevice reach and larger listed dust bin Lighter grab-and-go handheld cleaning
Amazon.ca ASIN B07R9GP85M B08559K2DL
Power detail 12 V and 120 W listed on Amazon.ca 80 W listed on Amazon.ca; Shark support identifies CH900-series specs separately
Dust cup / capacity 750 mL listed on Amazon.ca and retailer pages 0.54 qt on Amazon.ca; Shark support FAQ lists 0.45 qt for CH900/CH950 series specs
Weight Amazon.ca lists 1.09 kg Amazon.ca lists 2 lb; Shark support FAQ lists CH900-series weight at 2.27 lb
Tools Extra-long crevice tool / extended reach emphasized in retailer information Crevice tool and scrubbing brush listed on Amazon.ca
Cleaning system Two speeds and Power Boost listed by retailer information Two cyclonic air streams, washable filter and CleanTouch dirt ejector listed by Shark/Amazon.ca
Charging detail 5-hour charging time listed on Amazon.ca and retailer information Charging cord and lithium-ion battery listed; charging time should be confirmed on the current product page/manual
Amazon.ca View BLACK+DECKER View Shark

Where they differ

The main difference in BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 vs Shark CH901 in Canada is cleaning style. BLACK+DECKER is built around a larger listed bin and longer crevice reach. Shark is built around a lighter body, cyclonic airflow wording, washable filter, and quick emptying.

Dust bin and cleanup capacity

The BLACK+DECKER listing shows a larger capacity on paper at 750 mL. The Shark listing shows 0.54 qt, while Shark’s own CH900/CH950 support FAQ lists 0.45 qt for dust capacity. Because source wording differs slightly for Shark, the safest reading is that BLACK+DECKER has the clearer larger capacity advantage based on the checked listings.

BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10750 mL listed
Shark CH9010.45–0.54 qt listed range

Bars compare listed dust-cup capacity only. They do not represent suction, runtime, noise, reliability, or cleaning performance.

Weight and quick handling

Shark has the clearer lightweight advantage. Amazon.ca lists CH901 at 2 lb, while Shark’s support FAQ lists CH900-series weight at 2.27 lb. The BLACK+DECKER listing shows 1.09 kg, which is about 2.4 lb. That difference is small, but it matters for overhead shelves, car seats, stair edges and quick one-handed use.

BLACK+DECKER
1.09 kg listed
Shark
2 lb on Amazon.ca
BLACK+DECKER
750 mL bin listed
Shark
Washable filter listed

Crevice reach versus scrubbing brush

BLACK+DECKER’s strongest practical angle is reach. The HHVK320J10 family is promoted around an extra-long crevice tool and Power Boost. Shark CH901 includes a crevice tool and scrubbing brush, which may be more useful for stuck-on dry debris, textured mats, and small upholstery jobs.

Maintenance routine

Both models are bagless, so the routine is dust cup emptying and filter care. Shark emphasizes a washable filter and CleanTouch dirt ejector. BLACK+DECKER replacement-filter compatibility is widely listed for the HHVK series, so shoppers should check filter availability before treating either model as maintenance-free.

Product breakdowns

BLACK+DECKER dustbuster AdvancedClean+ HHVK320J10

BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 is the reach-and-capacity pick. Amazon.ca identifies ASIN B07R9GP85M and lists the model with 12 V power detail, 120 W wattage, 750 mL capacity, lithium-ion battery, 5-hour charging time, and 1.09 kg item weight. Retailer information for the same model also highlights a 12 V MAX battery, an XL 750 mL dust bin, two speeds, Power Boost, and an extra-long crevice tool.

Voltage
12 V listed
Wattage
120 W listed
Capacity
750 mL listed
Charging
5 hours listed

Choose this model if your main cleanup tasks are crumbs in corners, dry debris in car seats, baseboards, stair edges, kitchen drawers, pantry shelves, sofa gaps, and places where a longer nozzle helps. The larger listed dust bin is also useful if you do not want to empty the vacuum after every small pass.

Main limitation: it is not the lighter option by the checked listings. If one-handed handling and fast grab-and-go use matter more than dust-bin size, Shark CH901 is easier to justify.

See Which Version Fits Your Setup

Shark CH901 UltraCyclone Pro Cordless Handheld Vacuum

Shark CH901 is the light grab-and-go pick. Amazon.ca identifies ASIN B08559K2DL and lists the model with an 80 W power figure, lithium-ion battery description, crevice tool, scrubbing brush, washable filter, 0.54 qt capacity, and 2 lb item weight. Shark’s support pages for the CH900/CH950 series list CH901 support, dust capacity at 0.45 qt, charging cord length at 3 ft, and CH900-series weight at 2.27 lb.

Wattage
80 W listed
Weight
2 lb on Amazon.ca
Filter
Washable filter listed
Tools
Crevice and scrubbing brush

Choose this model if you want a lighter handheld vacuum for quick cleanups around a couch, desk, car seat, kitchen mat, windowsill, or entryway. The scrubbing brush and CleanTouch emptying angle may also suit households that want a small vacuum that feels simple to use and empty.

Main limitation: it has the smaller listed dust cup compared with the BLACK+DECKER. If your usual messes fill a bin quickly, or you want more crevice reach, the HHVK320J10 is the better match.

View Current Product Options

Decision guide

Choose this

BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10

Pick BLACK+DECKER if you want the larger listed dust bin, extra-long crevice reach, two speeds, Power Boost and a stronger fit for deeper gaps or bigger dry debris sessions.

Choose this

Shark CH901

Pick Shark if you want the lighter listed handheld vacuum, washable filter, CleanTouch dirt ejector, crevice tool, scrubbing brush and compact quick-clean feel.

Buying advice before you choose

Before choosing between BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 vs Shark CH901 in Canada, think about where the handheld vacuum will live. A hand vacuum only helps if it is easy to grab before a small mess becomes a bigger cleaning job.

  • Choose by mess type: crumbs and car gaps favour crevice reach; light surface messes favour lower carry weight.
  • Check the bin routine: a larger dust cup is useful if you dislike frequent emptying.
  • Check filter availability: washable or replaceable filters still need periodic cleaning and replacement planning.
  • Use for dry pickup: do not treat either handheld vacuum as a wet cleaner unless the manufacturer specifically says so.
  • Plan charging location: the best hand vacuum is usually the one stored close to the mess zone.

Fast setup filter

Larger listed bin: BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10

Lighter listed body: Shark CH901

Extra-long crevice reach: BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10

Washable filter focus: Shark CH901

For more home-cleaning guides, browse Hamejur’s Cleaning & Laundry and Cleaning Tools sections, or visit All Guides.

FAQ

Which handheld vacuum has the larger listed dust cup?

BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 has the larger listed dust cup based on the checked specifications. Amazon.ca lists 750 mL for BLACK+DECKER, while Shark CH901 is listed around 0.45 to 0.54 qt depending on source wording.

Which one is lighter?

Shark CH901 is lighter based on the checked listings. Amazon.ca lists it at 2 lb, while BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 is listed at 1.09 kg.

Which one is better for car interiors?

BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 is appealing for car interiors if the extra-long crevice reach matters. Shark CH901 is appealing if lower weight and the included scrubbing brush matter more.

Can these replace a full-size vacuum?

No. These are handheld vacuums for quick dry pickups. For whole-room floors, deep carpet work or large debris, a stick vacuum, upright vacuum or suitable floor cleaner is usually more appropriate.

Which one would I choose first?

I would choose BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 for dust cup size and crevice reach. I would choose Shark CH901 for lighter handling and fast grab-and-go cleanup.

What I would choose

If I were buying for a kitchen, car, stairs and couch-gap routine, I would choose BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10. The larger listed 750 mL dust bin, extra-long crevice tool, two speeds and Power Boost are practical for the messes that usually make people reach for a handheld vacuum.

If I were buying for a small apartment, desk area, entryway, or quick surface pickups, I would choose Shark CH901. The lighter listed weight, washable filter, CleanTouch emptying and included scrubbing brush make it feel better suited to frequent short cleaning sessions.

The practical answer is simple: choose BLACK+DECKER for reach and capacity, and choose Shark for lighter quick-clean handling.

Check BLACK+DECKER HHVK320J10 on Amazon.ca Check Shark CH901 on Amazon.ca

Sources and method

This guide compares listed Amazon.ca product identity pages, Shark support information, retailer specification pages, dust-cup capacity, weight, listed power details, included tools, filter maintenance, charging information and practical quick-cleanup fit. It does not include static prices, star ratings, review counts, stock claims, customer-review claims, or hands-on testing claims.

Keep comparing

Related guides for your next decision

Continue with closely related Cleaning Tools comparisons selected by category, shared product topics, and reader intent.

Powered by
►
Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.
None
►
Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.
None
►
Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.
None
►
Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.
None
Powered by