SodaStream Terra vs Art in Canada: Which Sparkling Water Maker Fits Your Kitchen?
SodaStream Terra vs Art in Canada compared by carbonation control, bottle setup, CO2 cylinder type, counter fit and everyday kitchen use.
Estimated reading time: 7 minutes
Compact countertop microwaves are not all the same: the real choice is between minimum counter space, simple 700-watt reheating, and a slightly larger 900-watt model.
If you are comparing the best compact countertop microwaves in Canada, start with the capacity and footprint first. The Chefman RJ55-SS-7 and Danby DBMW0722BBS are both 0.7 cu. ft. 700-watt models for tight counters. The Panasonic NN-SG448SC steps up to 0.9 cu. ft. and 900 watts, but it needs more counter depth and width.
3 compact modelsAll are countertop microwaves
0.7 to 0.9 cu. ft.Capacity range compared
700 to 900 wattsListed cooking power range
Quick Verdict: Best Compact Countertop Microwaves in Canada
Chefman RJ55-SS-7
A 0.7 cu. ft. stainless model with 700 watts, 10 power levels, memory, multiphase cooking, mute, Eco mode, and a listed 20.2 lb weight.
- Smallest capacity tier in this comparison
- Good fit if memory and mute controls matter
- Same listed footprint class as the Danby
Danby DBMW0722BBS
A 0.7 cu. ft. 700-watt model with 10 power levels, six auto-cook options, express cook, +30 seconds, time/weight defrost, and listed safety-lock features.
- Compact 17.32-inch wide body
- Clear button-style control approach
- 12-month parts and labour warranty listed on Amazon.ca
Panasonic NN-SG448SC
A 0.9 cu. ft. compact microwave with 900 watts, seven auto-cook programs, auto defrost, a 10.5-inch glass turntable, and a wider listed footprint.
- Largest capacity in this group
- Higher listed cooking power
- Better fit when counter space is not the tightest constraint
Products Compared
These three models are close enough for a fair small-kitchen comparison: all are countertop microwaves, all target everyday reheating and defrosting, and each is listed on Amazon.ca with model-level identity. The main trade-off is simple: 0.7 cu. ft. models save space, while the Panasonic gives more listed capacity and power.
0.7 cu. ft. compact
Chefman Countertop 0.7 Cu. Ft. Digital Stainless Microwave Oven, RJ55-SS-7
This Chefman is the control-rich 0.7 cu. ft. option. It keeps the listed capacity and wattage modest, but adds memory, multiphase cooking, mute, Eco mode, and a dishwasher-safe glass turntable according to Chefman’s product information.
Trade-off: the listed capacity is smaller than the Panasonic, so it is better for reheating, drinks, small plates, and compact kitchens than for larger dishware.
ModelRJ55-SS-7
ASINB0C6RBYZ49
Capacity0.7 cu. ft.
Power700 W
Dimensions17.32 × 12.95 × 10.2 in
Weight20.2 lb
0.7 cu. ft. compact
Danby 0.7 Cu. Ft. Countertop Microwave in Black and Stainless Steel, DBMW0722BBS
The Danby keeps the same compact 0.7 cu. ft. size class and 700-watt cooking power, then leans into direct controls: express cook, +30 seconds, time cook, auto defrost by time or weight, and a control-panel lock.
Trade-off: compared with the Chefman, the Danby is less about extra control features like mute and Eco mode, and more about familiar microwave buttons.
ModelDBMW0722BBS
ASINB0DD8S2NQN
Capacity0.7 cu. ft.
Cooking power700 W
Dimensions17.32 × 12.95 × 10.2 in
Unit weight20.24 lb
0.9 cu. ft. compact
Panasonic Compact 900W Microwave Oven, NN-SG448SC
The Panasonic is the step-up option in this comparison. Its official Canadian product information lists 0.9 cu. ft. capacity, 900 watts, auto cook with seven program settings, defrost, a 10.5-inch glass turntable, and exterior dimensions of 19 1/8 × 11 9/16 × 14 13/16 inches.
Trade-off: it gives more capacity and power, but its listed footprint is noticeably larger than the two 0.7 cu. ft. models.
ModelNN-SG448SC
ASINB0D2Y7BDD2
Capacity0.9 cu. ft.
Power900 W
Dimensions19.1 × 14.8 × 11.6 in
Turntable10.5 in
Compact Comparison Table
| Product | Model / ASIN | Capacity | Cooking power | Listed dimensions | Controls and functions | Best suited use | Amazon.ca |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chefman Countertop 0.7 Cu. Ft. Digital Stainless Microwave Oven | RJ55-SS-7 / B0C6RBYZ49 | 0.7 cu. ft. | 700 W | 17.32 W × 12.95 D × 10.2 H in | 6 presets, 10 power levels, memory, multiphase cooking, +30 seconds, mute, Eco mode, child lock | Small kitchens where quiet mode and saved settings matter | Check current price |
| Danby 0.7 Cu. Ft. Countertop Microwave | DBMW0722BBS / B0DD8S2NQN | 0.7 cu. ft. | 700 W | 17.32 W × 12.95 D × 10.2 H in | 10 power levels, 6 auto-cook options, express cook, +30 seconds, auto defrost, time cook, safety lock | Basic reheating with familiar button-style operation | Check current price |
| Panasonic Compact 900W Microwave Oven | NN-SG448SC / B0D2Y7BDD2 | 0.9 cu. ft. | 900 W | 19.1 W × 14.8 D × 11.6 H in | 7 auto-cook programs, auto defrost, 4-digit display, child safety lock, glass tray | Shoppers who can give up more counter space for more listed capacity | Check current price |
Visual Buying Guide
Here is the quick visual version of the comparison. The bars use the largest value in this group as the full-width reference, so the two 0.7 cu. ft. models show as smaller than the 0.9 cu. ft. Panasonic.
Capacity: interior room
Chefman RJ55-SS-70.7 cu. ft.
Danby DBMW0722BBS0.7 cu. ft.
Panasonic NN-SG448SC0.9 cu. ft.
Cooking power: listed watts
Chefman RJ55-SS-7700 W
Danby DBMW0722BBS700 W
Panasonic NN-SG448SC900 W
Counter footprint: width × depth
Chefman RJ55-SS-7about 224 sq. in.
Danby DBMW0722BBSabout 224 sq. in.
Panasonic NN-SG448SCabout 282 sq. in.
The Panasonic gives more listed capacity, but its width and depth also take more counter surface.
Control style at a glance
ChefmanMore convenience extras: memory, mute, Eco mode, multiphase cooking.
DanbyFamiliar operation: express cook, time cook, auto defrost, six auto-cook options.
PanasonicSimpler larger model: seven auto-cook settings, auto defrost, clear display.
Small apartmentsChefman or Danby make the most sense when every inch of counter depth matters.
Shared kitchensDanby’s direct controls may be easier for different people to use without explanation.
More reheating roomPanasonic is the better fit when 0.7 cu. ft. feels too limiting.
Individual Product Reviews
Chefman RJ55-SS-7 Review
Compact with extra controlsWhat stands out about the Chefman is not raw size. It is a compact 0.7 cu. ft. microwave with 700 watts, so the practical reason to choose it is the control set. Chefman lists six cooking presets, 10 power levels, a memory function, multiphase cooking, mute, Eco mode, +30 seconds, and childproof safety lock.
This may suit a small household, apartment, office nook, or secondary kitchen where the microwave is mostly used for drinks, leftovers, simple reheating, and small frozen portions. The listed 20.2 lb weight is also lighter than the Panasonic listing, which matters if the microwave may be moved for cleaning or seasonal use.
Another compared option may fit better if you want more interior room. The Panasonic’s 0.9 cu. ft. capacity and 900 watts give it a stronger spec position for larger plates and more frequent reheating.
Choose this if
you want a compact 0.7 cu. ft. model with mute, memory, Eco mode, and saved-setting convenience.
you want a compact 0.7 cu. ft. model with mute, memory, Eco mode, and saved-setting convenience.
Skip this if
you want the largest listed capacity in this comparison or prefer very basic controls.
you want the largest listed capacity in this comparison or prefer very basic controls.
Danby DBMW0722BBS Review
Compact and familiarThe Danby DBMW0722BBS is closest to the Chefman on core size and power: 0.7 cu. ft., 700 watts, and the same listed width, depth, and height in the specification sheet. The difference is the way the feature set is framed. Danby lists express cook buttons from 1 to 6 minutes, +30 seconds, time cook, auto defrost by time or weight, six auto-cook options, and control-lock features.
For a household that wants a small microwave without extra learning, this is the cleanest pick. The controls are more conventional than the Chefman’s feature-heavy angle, and the official manual clearly explains the power-level chart, auto-cook categories, express cook, +30 seconds, safety lock, and memory operation.
The main limitation is the same one that comes with the Chefman: 0.7 cu. ft. is a compact cavity. It is sensible for tight spaces, but not the strongest choice if you regularly use larger plates or containers.
Choose this if
you want compact size, 700-watt reheating, and familiar button-style microwave operation.
you want compact size, 700-watt reheating, and familiar button-style microwave operation.
Skip this if
you want the Chefman’s mute and Eco mode features or the Panasonic’s larger listed capacity.
you want the Chefman’s mute and Eco mode features or the Panasonic’s larger listed capacity.
Panasonic NN-SG448SC Review
More room and powerThe Panasonic NN-SG448SC is still compact, but it is the roomier model here. Panasonic Canada lists 0.9 cu. ft. capacity, 900 watts, auto cook with seven program settings, defrost, a 4-digit white LCD display, a 10.5-inch glass turntable, and exterior dimensions of 293 × 485 × 375 mm.
This may suit a household that does not want a full mid-size microwave but finds 0.7 cu. ft. too restrictive. It also makes sense when a microwave will be used several times a day and the buyer is willing to trade more counter space for higher listed cooking power.
The trade-off is footprint. At roughly 19.1 inches wide and 14.8 inches deep, it takes more counter surface than the Chefman or Danby. Measure your available space before choosing it, especially if the microwave will sit under cabinets or beside another appliance.
Choose this if
you want the largest listed capacity and highest listed wattage among these three models.
you want the largest listed capacity and highest listed wattage among these three models.
Skip this if
your main priority is the smallest footprint or the lowest-profile compact body.
your main priority is the smallest footprint or the lowest-profile compact body.
Decision Guide
Which one fits the tightest counter?
Chefman and Danby are the stronger fit. Their listed 17.32-inch width and 12.95-inch depth keep them in the smallest footprint group here.
Which one has the larger listed capacity?
Panasonic. It lists 0.9 cu. ft., compared with 0.7 cu. ft. for both Chefman and Danby.
Which one keeps operation simple?
Danby is the easiest to explain from the listed controls: express cook, +30 seconds, time cook, auto defrost, and six auto-cook options.
Which one has more convenience extras?
Chefman is the better fit if mute, Eco mode, memory, and multiphase cooking matter more than extra interior capacity.
Buying Advice
Before buying a compact countertop microwave, measure the space where it will sit, including the depth available after leaving room for the cord, ventilation, and door swing. A microwave can look compact in a listing but still crowd a small counter if it is pushed beside a kettle, toaster, or coffee maker.
For solo users, dorm-style rooms, basement suites, and small apartments, 0.7 cu. ft. can be enough for basic reheating and drinks. For couples, shared kitchens, or anyone reheating larger containers, 0.9 cu. ft. may feel more forgiving.
Wattage matters, but it should not be the only decision point. A 900-watt microwave has a stronger listed cooking-power spec than a 700-watt microwave, yet the larger exterior footprint may be the wrong trade-off in a very small kitchen. Controls also matter. Some shoppers want the least complicated button layout possible, while others prefer saved settings, mute, and Eco mode.
For cleaning, look for a removable glass turntable and a simple interior that can be wiped after spills. Also check the current Amazon.ca listing before buying, because product pages can change, and shipping, return terms, and included documentation may vary.
FAQ
Is 0.7 cu. ft. enough for everyday use?
It can be enough for drinks, small plates, leftovers, and simple reheating. It is not the best fit if you regularly use large dinner plates, tall containers, or bigger meal-prep dishes.
Should I choose 700 watts or 900 watts?
Based on the listed specifications, 900 watts gives the Panasonic the higher cooking-power spec. The 700-watt Chefman and Danby models may still make sense when saving counter space is more important than stepping up power.
Which model is best for an apartment kitchen?
For the tightest counters, Chefman or Danby are stronger fits because they use the smaller 0.7 cu. ft. footprint. If your apartment has enough counter depth, the Panasonic may be more comfortable because of its 0.9 cu. ft. capacity.
Do these models include live prices or ratings here?
No. Prices, ratings, review counts, stock, and promotions can change quickly. Use the Amazon.ca buttons to check the current product page before buying.
Are these hands-on reviews?
No. This comparison is based on Amazon.ca product identity, official product information, manuals, and listed specifications. Hamejur does not claim hands-on testing for this guide.
What I Would Choose
For a small Vancouver-style apartment kitchen where counter space is the biggest limit, I would choose the Danby DBMW0722BBS. It has the same compact 0.7 cu. ft. and 700-watt class as the Chefman, but its listed control setup is simple and easy to understand.
If I wanted the most feature control in the smallest capacity tier, I would choose the Chefman RJ55-SS-7 instead because of mute, Eco mode, memory, and multiphase cooking. If I had enough counter depth and wanted more room inside, I would move up to the Panasonic NN-SG448SC for its listed 0.9 cu. ft. capacity and 900 watts.
Sources and Method
This comparison is based on listed product specifications, Amazon.ca product identity pages, official manufacturer product information, and available manuals or specification documents. It is not based on hands-on testing.
- Chefman RJ55-SS-7 Amazon.ca listing and Chefman product information
- Danby DBMW0722BBS Amazon.ca listing, Danby owner’s manual, and DBMW0722BBS specification sheet
- Panasonic NN-SG448SC Amazon.ca listing and Panasonic Canada product information
- Related Hamejur references: Kitchen Appliances, Blog / All Guides, How We Compare, and Editorial Policy
